How should states who are all facing the same security dilemma interact

at heart a society, the populace are compelled to follow rules due to being prompted by a higher authority. When these laws fail, rectifying this deficiency becomes a priority of the give tongue to murderers are arrested, riots are suppressed, new regulations and safe checks are imposed to deter future tense renegades from harassing the system. These actions by the states sovereign power ensure that the community of interests remains harmonious and balanced. Within the international community an individual state is unable to defer to a higher authority to demand that nicety be enforced, since there is no authority higher than the state itself. The importee of this is that independent nations are forced to rely on themselves for protection indoors international society. These facts lead to a interrogative that has been at the core of plainly war theory debates how should states who are all facing the same security dilemma interact with one another? The various theoretic al answers to this question form to two fundamentally opposed conclusions nations pass on either try out to expand their individual power to facilitate their own security, or ordain construct an international union to ensure mutual defense. While the latter(prenominal) promotes an international community based upon cooperation, the former predicts perpetual conflict. In vow to perform an analysis of these conflicting predictions we will turn to Thucydides, who provides a historical example of this debate within his recount of the Melian Dialogue. Within this dialogue, the powerful Athenians tramp that strength alone justifies their demand for the submission of the weaker island of Melos. The Melians counter with their own vindication to justice, claiming that the advancement of Athenian power and Melian autonomy a... ...rve life and avoid finish stirs that the law of nature is more suited to cooperation than conflict. Using power to keep on power ensures the necessit y of the continual use of force to quell those who a states power is used to oppress. As the Athenians looked to history to prove that Nature always compels men to rule over anyone they can control, it fails to distinguish that nature also compels men to be free, and the violence of the oppressor will be pitted against the violence oppressed. Even if the more powerful state is boffo in its conquest, it will always be at war with those whose conversancy it infringes upon. The strength that a nation utilizes to allow them to conquer today will be the same strength that forces them to fight tomorrow, and the next day. For these reasons the arguments of the Athenians must be rejected for those of the Melians.