Organizations in Social Responsibilities Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Organizations in Social Responsibilities - Essay ExampleAnd lots the right demonstrates our imperfections and uncertainties. Socially responsible for(p) behavior is crucial for companies because they, above all, should embody social principles and ideals that must non be violated easily or at all (Beauchamp & Bowie 2003).Organizations should engage in socially responsible behavior because it is a core of business and fair economic relations. We could not live in a community in which taking what one wants had no consequences. So the socially responsible behavior found on law is both a set of structures for social stability and a set of honorable guideposts. Individuals r arly cross the border from legal to illegal behavior. But crime is a fact of our commonplace life. Organizations should engage in socially responsible behavior because it drives their actions and strategic directions. Establishing CSR allows a firm to take disciplinary action by punishing employees who do not comply with comp each standards and rewarding those who do. For instance, precepts such as do not give wrong information ..., do not look for reciprocity (Boatright 1997, p. 54). When a human race assumes responsibility for managing the marketing behavior of a large corporation, he is transaction with every business law of the land, from antitrust to post office regulations. Socially responsible behavior is a model of business activities and long-run relations.2.2. Friedman once said The social responsibility of firms is to make a profit (Friedman 1970). Critically evaluate this view give the challenges faced by organisations today to manage a soma of stakeholders.Friedmans statement is based on the remarkable nature of business and trade relations. The primary aim of any corporations is to make a profit and summation revenues. A company cannot exist without financial resources and marketing activities (even a non-for-profit organizations need financial donations and giving). For many companies, acceptance of social responsibilities is no longer a matter of option for major enterprises if the business is to be germane(predicate) to the new social progress concerns and social value changes. The business concept offers a conceptual framework for integrating the firms relationship to its ultimate environment. The main problem is that organizations cannot use personal gains and profit maximization priorities dealing with diverse stakeholders. Friedman is right that social responsibility of a firm of a profit but any company operates in a complex environment and becomes a part of this environment. Companies are forced to go along ethical and incorrupt values as an extension of traditional management and marketing concepts with redefinitions of mission, service, consumer, product, and profit (Boatright, 1997). Companies are obliged to care for the public welfare, especially the interests of shareholders and other owners of corporate property, by telling t he truth and by resisting unethical propositions. The principle is veracity (truth telling) the assumption about consequences is that airing a grievance will maneuver to conflict resolution and that all parties, including society per se, will be better off if legal and moral norms are adhered to. The capacity to reflect seems quite limited in this case. The responsibility of business is to manage variety of stakeholders including employees, customers and community. Even if there is a conflict between professional responsibilities