The 1960’s pop music the-1960s

Does the evidence of C support the evidence of seeded players A and B about the effects of pop music in the 1960s? Explain your answer.In my opinion I think that source C doesnt support Sources A and B. I think this because from Source A you can learn that the Beatles had sooner a big impact in the 1960s. This extract is from Joanna Lumley and instead of the cause hour an extraordinary silence and emptiness had descended upon London, on England, on Britain. This arguing implies that countless people left work earlier than usual to construe the Beatles. The Beatles were performing on Juke Box panel. Juke Box Jury was Probably the most enduring of all pop panel shows and hosted by David Jacobs with his famous bell and hooter for Hit and Miss.From this quotation we can see that at that place was usually a crowd of people at the tube station, precisely today thither was no-one and Joanna Lumley was surprised. I dare say that London must have been quieter seeing as the Beatles wer e on television, but considering that Joanna was only a young woman aged around 18, she maybe exaggerating in force(p) a little. This source was written 30 years after it actually happened. therefrom there is a weakness of memory.Source B is a explanation about a concert which was in the 1960s, however it was written in the 1990s. When I was s raseteen, in 1964 this quote proves that that whoever wrote the source was young and juvenile. So whence they could have over exaggerated in this source. It was written 30 years after the event, so this source could be seen as feeble and biased. The concert in question was a Rolling Stones concert. The person says We have move tickets, which meant that we could get really completion this meant all the belly laugh girls could be very close to the Rolling Stones, this gave the concert more atmosphere. I can remember their panicked faces, when they were trying to get off the stage, surrounded by the heaving, maniacal screaming mob. The R olling Stones were scared from all these fans. This person who wrote the source thought I doubt if the Stones ever played so near their audience again.Source C is Paul McCartney, a Beatles member, describing the Beatles concerts. Paul was talking in 1984, even though the concerts he is talking bout were in the 1960s and 70s. This source cannot be seen as entirely accurate because there could be lack of memory. In this source Paul says it was never as crazy as they use to say it was. I think by this quote that the fans who were actually there exaggerated more to make that experience they had seem better than what it was.I think that Source C doesnt support both Sources A and B because in Source C Paul says it wasnt that bad, fans were screaming but because they love you, not that they wanted to hurt you. Some fans were obsessive but they just wanted autographs. In Source A, it says that everybody left work early to go and watch TV, she doesnt know everybody in the UK so she cannot sa y that. Along with Source B it says that the Rolling Stones were frightened, how did she know that for a fact, she didnt exactly speak to them personally did she. So Source C contradicts Sources A and B.