Death Poetry Essay

Is expiry something to be feared when it may be considered the wholly aspect during action that is inevitable? Inte suspensioningly, the speakers in deuce poetrys written by Emily Dickinson and Alan Seeger may not feel that this is the case. In Dickinsons The Chariot, the effeminate speaker compares softening to last as a chariot ride liberation places she has been in her life, while the speaker in Seegers I pretend a Rendezvous with termination is a mascu aviation speaker that is off-key to be a soldier fighting in the war and experiencing umteen close encounters with this morbid experience.Both poems together shed a wake of acceptance of death into world that generally has been taught to fear it, but in different extremes. I will argue that epoch is the ultimate cipher that contributes to the acceptance of ones passing a path. This will be shown through the comparison of the personas and literary devices in each poem, as Dickinsons speaker, who has been dead for ce nturies, in comparison to Seegers speaker, who is anticipating his death, have slight differences in the route they perceive death.Personification is cleverly used in both poems to humanise death and differentiates the two poems because of the certain characteristics that each poet gives to ending as a character. In Dickinsons poem, death is personified in a manner that makes finale an active agent that is continuously alongside the speaker. The speaker consistently refers to Death as a partner, using the words we and us in stanzas two through five. By utilizing embodiment in this way, the speaker sets up the touch sensation that death has been a long conviction partner of hers, not undecomposed an acquaintance, which indicates the length of epoch she must have spent with Death.The collaboration among the speaker and death in this poem shows that she has an acceptance of death as her friend. Also, the speaker further attributes human characteristics such(prenominal) as kind ness, and civility towards Death, which implies once more the long amount of time she must have accompanied Death in order to have intercourse such details about him, thus explaining why she is at ease with the idea of death. This is interesting because the difference domiciliate be seen in Seegers embodiment of Death.Human qualities are hush given to death, but done so in a way that would indicate that the speaker is codd to be just getting to know Death, implying that the speaker is not yet dead. The speaker in this poem describes death as taking my speaker hand And leading mespeaker (Seeger, 7-8), which produces the feeling that Death is the one with authority. By giving control to Death, the speaker seems uneasy and unsure of the situation. Is he to succumb to death or fight back?This automatically shows that the time advance between the two characters relationship is minimal, thus explaining his feeling of unsettlement towards death. This is made even up more clear wh en the speaker says that Death will take him into his subdued lands and close my speakers eyes and quench my speakers breath, (Seeger, 8-9). The personification of Death in Seegers poem is much more morbid than in Dickinsons and creates the brain of hostility that can be related to a negative firstly impression of another.In this case, Seegers speaker has not had much time with Death, therefore again explaining why he feels uncomfortable with death. Demonstrated here, the personification used in both poems gives an interesting way to establish time as a factor when considering the attitudes of each speaker towards death. While personification is used in these poems to humanize death and comment on time, it likewise provides a deeper insight into the underlying mood that each poet is trying to convey, therefore it is necessary to further examine the olfactory modality in each poem. by the use of diction, both poets are able to create a measure that demonstrates and adds to thei r speakers overall acceptance or rejection of death. As mentioned earlier, Dickinson uses such words such as civility and kindness to describe death which ultimately sets up a light tone when speaking of death. This is again related back to the easiness the speaker has with death, due to the long time for which she has been dead. Dickinson further uses the word chariot in the title, as well as referring to a carriage in the first stanza, which sets up an expectation that the poem will proceed slowly, which is true.The slowness assists with the idea of time because being that poem is slowed down with the words used in combination with longer line lengths and enjambment, the overall sense that the speaker is in no rush and evaluate of her circumstance is presented. The tone is quite tranquil and somewhat content as it seems that the speaker is accepting of her fate. Considering this with Seegers poem though, there are marked shifts in tone due to specific word choices.Initially the tone of the poem is similar to that of Dickinsons, as the most recurrent word passim the poem, tryst, sets a clear tone. This word choice is very historic because the poet decided to use a friendly term which one would assume is does out of free will and shows the approval of a meeting with death. except as the poem continues on, other words work well to defend this meaning. The tone begins to shift from the implied tone with the title, to the speaker commenting that they will have their rendezvous at some gainsay barricade (Seeger, 2).This automatically brings into focus that the speaker must be someone who knows war, and specifically using the word disputed indicates some conflict and a more harsh tone. Throughout the rest of the poem, word choice consistently changes setting bright and light moods to darker and heavier moods, demonstrate with the use of the word scarred (Seeger, 12), but then contradicting it with nature and life like apple-blossoms ( Seeger, 4) for example . The many shifts in tone implies that the time of death is turn up for this.